Sign In
Register
Help
The server has been 32 players for a while now and after monitoring the bandwidth I say it's possible to bring this back up to 40p. But before doing this, I'd like to know what the community actually prefers. A big 40 player all-out-war server, or a smaller one with 32 slots? Maybe 36? Post it up!
I give this poll about 10 hours from now on.
Page 1 of 1
- You cannot start a new topic
-
This topic is locked
Jelly AOW Size?
Rate Topic:
1 Votes
MultiQuote
#3
Helios 
- Hacker
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,331
- Joined: 14-November 09
- LocationCalifornia
Posted 17 June 2010 - 02:13 AM
I think it should stay at 32.
Some people enjoy both smaller games and larger games.
AOW should be smaller as it has a time limit, and Mara should stay bigger as it has more of that "big long match" feel to it.
Some people enjoy both smaller games and larger games.
AOW should be smaller as it has a time limit, and Mara should stay bigger as it has more of that "big long match" feel to it.
#5
TD
- HNIC
-
- Group: Administrators
- Posts: 3,355
- Joined: 20-February 07
Posted 17 June 2010 - 02:43 AM
Added 36/other, but do post in case you choose this. However, I'd rather stay 32 (pure Renegade, 16v16) or move up to 40 and maximize it.
R.I.P. Spoonplex said:
Dieing is an inherently weak tactic largely employed by noobs who clearly think respawning is somehow fun and cool, only problem is irl ppl don't respawn :(
#7
geawiel
- Jelly Bean
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 11-June 10
- LocationReady to steal your tank
Posted 17 June 2010 - 07:39 AM
40, I like 20 vs 20 personally. Smaller matches tend to be very one sided and over quickly. My friend and I also don't really like playing no time limit matches either. We usually don't have a lot of time to play (especially my friend since he's full time gaurd and 3 hours ahead of me) so the unlimited time servers aren't the best for us to play. So if AOW goes small man and Mara goes big we're likely to have to find a different server to play on 
#8
Tiesto
- God
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 156
- Joined: 14-January 10
Posted 17 June 2010 - 07:49 AM
wheres the option for 4 players?
You've got to hold and give,But do it at the right time,You can be slow or fast,But you must get to the line, They'll always hit you and hurt you
Defend and attack, Theres only one way to beat them, Get round the back, Catch me if you can, Cos' I'm the England man, And what you're looking at
Is the master plan, We ain't no hooligans, This ain't a football song, Three lions on my chest, I know we can't go wrong
#10
Kateeeee
- Jelly Regular
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 201
- Joined: 06-January 10
- LocationUnited States
Posted 17 June 2010 - 08:31 AM
I think 40 would be better. Then, people could have their choice of a smaller or larger game (Smaller being a time where there's not a lot of people in the server).
I wear my sunglasses at night.
#17
TD
- HNIC
-
- Group: Administrators
- Posts: 3,355
- Joined: 20-February 07
Posted 17 June 2010 - 02:59 PM
The majority does want a bigger server than 32p at least, and 40p outvotes the others by lot. I have not voted myself, but I think having 40p is better, we can handle more slots, why not? 8 more slots in a big game does not matter too much, only gives more people the opportunity to play.
Thanks for your opinions guys, we're going with 40p.
Thanks for your opinions guys, we're going with 40p.
R.I.P. Spoonplex said:
Dieing is an inherently weak tactic largely employed by noobs who clearly think respawning is somehow fun and cool, only problem is irl ppl don't respawn :(
Page 1 of 1
- You cannot start a new topic
-
This topic is locked
1 User(s) are reading this topic